Because experience sharing produces better outcomes than advice. Kris Kluver, in The Dysfunctional Family Office, frames the rule directly. Members of a Peer Circle don't give advice. They share what they actually experienced when faced with a similar challenge. What did they feel. How did they handle it. What worked. What didn't. What would they have done differently. The distinction matters. Advice is generic and often wrong because it's untethered from the giver's actual life. Experience sharing is specific, grounded, and useful even when it comes from a different industry or scale. The hot-seat member gets multiple actual data points instead of one consultant-flavored opinion. They synthesize the inputs and choose their own action item. The format also protects the group from the dynamic where one loud voice ends up advising everyone. Every member shares their experience. The hot-seat member chooses what to take. Kris Kluver runs Peer Circles using this exact discipline. Learn more at thethirtyadvisors.com.
Why don't peer circles give advice the way mastermind groups do?
Framework: Experience Sharing · Chapter: Ch 14: Lonely at the Top
Also asked
- experience sharing not advice giving
- peer circle no advice rule
- I'm tired of advice, I just want to hear what other CEOs actually did when they faced this